Dr. James White was reviewing the Steven Ritchie versus Edward Dalcour debate that took place on January 6, 2018. While on the Dividing Line program January 11, 2018 and was attempting to explain the Oneness position as two persons for Oneness. You can view the one minute clip that I captured below.
Did James White expose his own position as polytheistic in explaining the Oneness position? You can be the judge?
The relevant portion of the video is where he attempts to explain the Oneness position and begins by saying : the Father and Son "are having a conversation internally between the human Son and the divine Father who are one person, but.. Sort, not really, they are sort of two persons because they are talking to each other." I believe Dr. White was attempting to display an absurdity in the Oneness position when it makes his own trinity doctrine more absurd and is very revealing of what he actually believes if one is being honest. If there is one only God would he not be having an internal discussion? There most certainly could not be another God to have a discussion with. This is where the multiple God persons come about fr the Trinitarian position. This proves the Oneness position and actually highlights the truth of the incarnation. What makes an incarnation? One God and one man make the incarnation.
I have submitted two versions in case some are more interested in what is said the second video actually just highlights Dr. Whites attempts at explaining the Oneness view the first is a little longer.
1 comment:
To me this shows trinitarians do not believe in one God. For if God is truly one then God would be talking to Himself. They have admitted to more than one God.
Trinitarians miss the mark by not seeing a real man (God manifest) praying.
Side note, years ago in the White / Sabin debate in cross exam White kept pushing Sabin on John 17:5 it seemed White wanted to know if Jesus praying was the voice of the Father as if there is no son involved.
God Bless
Post a Comment