Tuesday, June 27, 2023

"Paul Never says By Faith Alone." By Jason staples Article. Interesting read.

 Jason Staples a Trinitarian, is the Only One of few people teaching about this subject, who seems to get this right. Be sure to go to the comments section and read 
the objections to Professor Staples arguments before leaving this article? You can read the Article Here


Saturday, June 24, 2023

 Philippians 2:5-6 the difference between Eidos (pronounced aay- daws) and Morphe ( pronounced More-Fey). The words used for Form.

I am the LORD; I change not” (Malachi 3:6).
Eidos and Morphe differences...... Morphe is a Philosophical term that does not necessarily have to do with what you see although I have had trinitarain's tell me that it meant God had a form all along especially using the word from Philippians 2.
Philippians 2:5-6 which is different from Isaiah 53:2 he had no form(Shape or what you see, but the two terms are closely related) or comeliness. Meaning his form(What was seen, was beaten beyond recognition.
It is the Greek morphe, for which English has no exact equivalent. Unlike "form" in English, morphe does not mean "shape."
It is a philosophical term that means "the outward expression of an inner essence." It does have to do with what you see
concerning Jesus, but not at all how alot folks believe it ..
Interesting view of What the Bible says about Morphe
(From Forerunner Commentary) Points to consider? this is trinitarain writing commentary and View, to which I do not agree with pre-existence of the Son of God as another God person with a God person or persons.
Philippians 2:5-6
"These verses provide the background for Christ's incarnation. The first word we need to consider is form in verse 6. It is the Greek morphe, for which English has no exact equivalent. Unlike "form" in English, morphe does not mean "shape." It is a philosophical term that means "the outward expression of an inner essence." We can derive an illustration of this definition from figure skating. One might say, "I went to the Winter Olympics, and the figure skater's form was outstanding." What is meant is that skater's swift, rhythmic grace, and coordinated movements were an outward expression of his inward ability to skate expertly.
Jesus was in the form (morphe) of God. The word being indicates a condition that began in the past and continues into the present. Therefore, while on earth, the outward expression of His inmost being was the expression of the divine essence, deity."
John W. Ritenbaugh
Fully Man and Fully God?"
The very example is given of an Ice skater's impeccable ability to perform that which comes from the inside. (What we see) the same is true with Jesus. He was a man for all intents and purposes to look upon his form(Shape)he looked like any other man, but inwardly he possessed more ( Form eidos). All power In heaven and earth is given ( the manpossessed) unot me. Matthew 28:18. Jesus was given the Spirit by no measure John 3:34. he was made Both Lord and Christ Acts 2:36. He was made the Life giving Spirit. 1 Cor. 15:45.

John 2:19 Jesus answered and said unto them, Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up.

20 Then said the Jews, Forty and six years was this temple in building, and wilt thou rear it up in three days?

21 But he spake of the temple of his body.

22 When therefore he was risen from the dead, his disciples remembered that he had said this unto them; and they believed the scripture, and the word which Jesus had said.

23 Now when he was in Jerusalem at the passover, in the feast day, many believed in his name, when they saw the miracles which he did.

Do Oneness have a problem with this analysis? No, we should Not!Not even in reading the entire commentary. The key is the words: "retained and clutched" which fits perfectly with the view: God nor the man Changes and it is a matter of what he the man possesses( Once more The words "clutched" and "retained" in the trinitarian analysis) that makes Jesus God and man without some view of a hybrid Hercules Jesus ( ridiculous Godman) to which there can be no such thing. Jesus is Both God(The Only true God the Father) and man(The Son of God) at the same time: Unmixed, not just one or the other.
you can read the original commentary here .

Tuesday, June 20, 2023

 How does God become a man, without the man becoming God? Which God became man?  The Trinity is not One God. it should not be debated as such.

Sunday, March 12, 2023

I John 1:1 Proves John 1 Cannot Mean "Face To Face" In Some Eternal Staring Contest between Two God Persons.


The passage in question: 1 John 1:1-2

1That which was from the beginning, which we have heard, which we have seen with our eyes, which we have looked upon, and our hands have handled, of the Word of life;(The phrase  the word of life is broken off or compounded from the single phrase to attempt to prove The word was Jesus and then of life is something else disconnected from the phrase.The next verse will not allow it.

2(For the life was manifested, and we have seen it, and bear witness, and shew unto you that *eternal life,(*Accusative feminine singular  Adjective) which was with the Father, and was manifested unto us;) Eternal Life and the word of life are the same things.

The word of Life eternal life was with the Father.  It is not some compound: the word .... of life. It is one phrase:" the word of life." The Oneness view contends that the preposition* with* is concerning  the Life, death, burial, and resurrection of the Lord Jesus was in view as the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world  and was God's intention all along for mankind's redemption.

Para meaning from Bill Mounce.
Gloss:
(gen.) from; (dat.) with, before, *in the sight of;* (acc.) beside, along side, by, at.
The Cross was in the sight of God from the foundation of the world. Which is my view of para! Revelation 13:8 fits perfectly


The following is an argument from a Trinitatian and is connected  with the above  point.

"Hebrews 10:5 says Christ says these words AS he is coming into the world, not when he was already in it. He says the body was prepared FOR HIM, not that he IS himself that body. Also he clearly says, "A body YOU have prepared for ME," not "A body have I prepared for myself." There's those clear-as-day distinguishing indicators so present in the text, which must be ignored to adhere to your view."
This is about coming into his ministry, it has nothing to do with coming from pre-existence. his body/person was prepared as a redemptive sacrifice from the foundation of the world, as the lamb slain from the foundation of the world Rev. 5:6,13:8. 
Jesus said "Father the same exact way "you sent me into the world even so have I sent them" into the world. John 17:18 Did they pre-exist since that was your point?

Sunday, February 26, 2023

 The Spirit of the Son was there at the time of creation. That Spirit was the Spirit Oneness cry (as the only true God) ABBA Father. Gal. 4:6 The Bible and Paul said The Son was a man Hebrews 10;12 and 1 Tim. 2:5. the man is the mediator to God. God is not the mediator to God.
Galatians 4:6 
And because ye are sons, God hath sent forth the Spirit of his Son into your hearts, crying, Abba, Father. The Son possessed the Spirit by no measure.John 3:34 he was not possessed.



Phillipians 2:5-,  Truth tellers know who the Son is according to his divinity. Jesus is both God and man. 
May be an image of text that says '5 Let this mind be in you, which was also in Christ Jesus: Who, being in the form of God, thought I it not robbery to be equal with God'

Friday, February 24, 2023

 

Baptism in Jesus"Name" Does not mean authority only! Eph. 1:21 Says Jesus name is above every single name that is named not only in this world but that to come.

Eph. 3:15 Talks about the name the whole family in heaven and earth wears.

John the Baptist was circumcised and named on the eighth day of his birth every male Jewish child was. read Luke 1:59-60

Paul himself wrote about this Spiritual naming and typed with the Old covenant circumcision in Col.2:11-13
11 In whom also ye are circumcised with the circumcision made without hands, in putting off the body of the sins of the flesh by the circumcision of Christ:
12 Buried with him in baptism, wherein also ye are risen with him through the faith of the operation of God, who hath raised him from the dead.
13 And you, being dead in your sins and the uncircumcision of your flesh, hath he quickened together with him, having forgiven you all trespasses;

Berean Literal Bible James 2:7 Are they not blaspheming the good Name having been called upon you?

Christian Standard Bible Don’t they blaspheme the good name that was invoked over you?

Holman Christian Standard Bible Don’t they blaspheme the noble name that was pronounced over you at your baptism?

New Revised Standard Version Is it not they who blaspheme the excellent name that was invoked over you?

Geneva Bible of 1587 Doe nor they blaspheme the worthie Name after which yee be named?

Bishops' Bible of 1568 Do not they blaspheme that good name by the which you are named?

Coverdale Bible of 1535 Do not they speake euell of that good name after which ye be named.

Tyndale Bible of 1526 Do not they speake evyll of that good name after which ye be named.

Literal Standard Version Do they not themselves speak evil of the good Name having been called on you?

Young's Literal Translation do they not themselves speak evil of the good name that was called upon you?

Smith's Literal Translation And do they not defame the good name called upon you?

Literal Emphasis Translation Are they not blaspheming the good name, having been called upon you?

Oneness are Not "Baptismal regenerationist" We do not believe Baptism alone saves anyone. In Fact Paul says in three places that belief and Baptism alone does not save. anyone.

1.) Acts 19:1-3 When he Asks followers of John the Baptist have you received the Holy Ghost since or when you believed? if you receive automatically upon belief then Paul would not be able to begin to even ask that question.The question would simply be: "have you believed on Jesus?" That would have told him everything he needed to know, but since that is false doctrine and Paul had no idea who these men were when he asked this shows the popular but wrong false doctrine is not bible fact but bible fiction!

2.) Romans 10:13-16 he went through a long list that people like to isolate in a vacuum to prove all sorts of false doctrines concerning Soterieology. Paul goes through the list and then negates salvation can come by believing in the privacy of your own room when he says the following.

13 For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved. 14 How then shall they call on him in whom they have not believed? and how shall they believe in him of whom they have not heard? and how shall they hear without a preacher? 15 And how shall they preach, except THEY BE SENT? as it is written, How beautiful are the feet of them that preach the gospel of peace, and bring glad tidings of good things! 16 But they have not all OBEYED the gospel. For Esaias saith, Lord, who hath believed our report? You cannot do any of those things without a preacher sent of God to tell you how to do those things. The only preachers we know that were sent of God for sure were the Apostles in scripture.(John 17;17-18) Thus again refuted! They preached Acts 2:38 to be saved!

3.) 1 Cor.15:29 Else what shall they do which are baptized for the dead, if the dead rise not at all? why are they then baptized for the dead? Paul is not talking about some cult that existed in his day. The proof is he is defending this. Why would Paul defend a Cult? Why not just allow them to think what they think? He is teaching the church at Corinth. He is teaching them about resurrection because some did not believe in resurrection from the dead and mentions baptism in passing. Why bother being Baptized as dead alien sinners if you are not going to raise from the dead? What are you doing this for? Paul says those who believe and are Baptized are still dead alien sinners until they have the Spirit also to raise them to new life. One does not get you the other automatically. Anyone who tells you, you are saved at belief alone or plus repentance or plus baptism and that you get the Spirit automatically with just any of those things in combination or alone is a liar! They are all good and are needed but Jesus said you must be born of water and of the Spirit or you cannot enter the kingdom.
Acts 2:38 Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.
Acts
 8:12 But when they believed Philip preaching the things concerning the kingdom of God, and the name of Jesus Christ, they were baptized, both men and women.
13 Then Simon himself believed also: and when he was baptized, he continued with Philip, and wondered, beholding the miracles and signs which were done.
14 Now when the apostles which were at Jerusalem heard that Samaria had received the word of God, they sent unto them Peter and John:
15 Who, when they were come down, prayed for them, that they might receive the Holy Ghost:
16 (For as yet he was fallen upon none of them: only they were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus.)
17 Then laid they their hands on them, and they received the Holy Ghost.
18 And when Simon saw that through laying on of the apostles' hands the Holy Ghost was given, he offered them money,

Acts 10:44 44 While Peter yet spake these words, the Holy Ghost fell on all them which heard the word.
45 And they of the circumcision which believed were astonished, as many as came with Peter, because that on the Gentiles also was poured out the gift of the Holy Ghost.
46 For they heard them speak with tongues, and magnify God. Then answered Peter,
47 Can any man forbid water, that these should not be baptized, which have received the Holy Ghost as well as we?
48 And he commanded them to be baptized in the name of the Lord. Then prayed they him to tarry certain days.

Acts 19:1-6 was already mentioned. Acts 22:16 And now why tarriest thou? arise, and be baptized, and wash away thy sins, calling on the name of the Lord.

Galatians 4:21 Tell me, ye that desire to be under the law, do ye not hear the law?

22 For it is written, that Abraham had two sons, the one by a bondmaid, the other by a freewoman.
23 But he who was of the bondwoman was born after the flesh; but he of the freewoman was by promise.
24 Which things are an allegory: for these are the two covenants; the one from the mount Sinai, which gendereth to bondage, which is Agar.
25 For this Agar is mount Sinai in Arabia, and answereth to Jerusalem which now is, and is in bondage with her children.
26 But Jerusalem which is above is free, which is the mother of us all.
He who overcomes, I will make him a pillar in the temple of My God, and he shall go out no more. I will write on him the name of My God and the name of the city of My God, the New Jerusalem, which comes down out of heaven from My God. And I will write on him My new name. Revelation 3:12
All three names are the same name. Jesus does not get a new name the overcomer gets the New view of the blasphemed name.
Do they not blaspheme that worthy name called over you at your Baptism? James 2:7 New Jerusalem is simply a picture of the Church. it is in both worlds.

I do believe there is an authority component to the name, but the three first passages I gave are talking about the literal spoken name Jesus. You do not have the authority without the name Jesus . I am not talking about saying in the name of Jesus every-time we take a step. every step we take is in the authority of Jesus since we have his name and Spirit. 

Colossians 3:17 The Seven sons of Sceva had a head knowledge of the Jesus whom Paul preaches.  They were not covered by the name.

Acts 19:13.



John 20:23 Whose soever sins you remit they are remitted unto them. Whose soever sins you retain they are retained. Jesus own words. I have used this argument several times with Trinitarian's. Given only knee jerk answers "you're Catholic." We must be honest. Claiming someone sins are forgiven because they asked is not honest. Now the bible says we can ask for forgiveness if we sin afterwards and we can believe we are because he is faithful to forgive. 

 This is how Phillipians 2 should be read.


Philippians 2 Is about what Trinitarians term" the Incarnation" it is not about "Pre-existence of the Son of God." I am going to add comments to this passage. My comments will contain an asteric * and parenthesis ()... *() 2 Fulfil ye my joy, that ye be like minded, having the same love, being of one accord, of one mind.
Let nothing be done through strife or vainglory; but in lowliness of mind let each esteem other better than themselves.
Look not every man on his own things, but every man also on the things of others. *(The above is about being humble, All the other passages coming are about Jesus our example)
Let this mind be in you, which was also in Christ Jesus:
Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God: *(God's form is the man Jesus. It is not the other way around. he Had No form or commliness that he should be desired. Because his form was beat up beyond recognition)
But made himself of no reputation,*(He was humble although he was God in Flesh. The Only true God John 17:3, He was made both Lord and Christ. Acts 2:36, He was made the Life Giving Spirit 1 Cor. 15:45, By being given the Spirit by no measure. John 3:34) and took upon him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men: (*He was made)
And being found in fashion as a man,(* Not God the Son, The Son was the man Jesus) he humbled himself, and became obedient unto death, even the death of the cross.*But this man after he had offered one sacrifice for sins sat down forever on the right hand of God.(Hebrews 10:12) How many Gods does it take to think it not robbery to be equal to one another? If your God you do not have to give it any thought, the genuine man doubted and needed help from his God and father.
Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name:
Like
Comment
Send

Most Relevant